Finally, real accountability is coming for the deep state operatives who tried to sabotage President Trump with the phony Ukraine impeachment. DNI Tulsi Gabbard has referred the 2019 whistleblower and former Intelligence Community IG Michael Atkinson to the DOJ for criminal investigation, exposing how they twisted rules and relied on hearsay to fuel a partisan hit job.
These declassified documents reveal Atkinson ignored proper procedures and DOJ advice, pushing a complaint built on secondhand information from biased sources tied to the Russia collusion hoax. It was never about national security—it was about rigging the system to remove a duly elected president.
The American people deserve justice after years of weaponized intelligence agencies. This is a vital step toward draining the swamp and restoring integrity to our government. No more two-tiered justice.
Your image from "Republican Army" says: "SHOCKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Has Just Sent CRIMINAL REFERRALS to the DOJ for the 'Whistleblower' Who Lied and Sparked President Trump's 2019 Impeachment. Deserved. THEY ARE GOING DOWN!"
The core fact is confirmed by multiple outlets: the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, under Tulsi Gabbard, has sent criminal referrals to the Justice Department focused on the former Intelligence Community Inspector General and the whistleblower behind the 2019 Ukraine complaint.
Fox News reported that ODNI sends criminal referrals to DOJ for ex-IG, whistleblower tied to Trump impeachment. An intelligence official told Fox the language is broad, but that it's specifically directed at Atkinson and the whistleblower who reported concerns about President Trump's July 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
What Gabbard actually did
According to ODNI's own release, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard alleges a conspiracy within the Intelligence Community, including former Inspector General Michael Atkinson, used fabricated narratives to justify Trump's 2019 impeachment. The documents, she says, reveal a coordinated effort to manufacture a conspiracy, with Atkinson's investigation into Trump's July 2019 call with Zelenskyy relying on politicized, unverified claims.
Gabbard's office declassified transcripts and internal emails from 2019, arguing they show:
- Atkinson moved the complaint forward despite it being based on second-hand information
- the whistleblower had prior political contacts that were not disclosed
- DOJ guidance at the time was set aside to allow the complaint to reach Congress
The New York Post summarized her claim that the 2019 Trump impeachment was a Democratic-driven "false narrative" orchestrated by the Intelligence Community, citing flawed procedures and biased evidence, and that Atkinson violated protocols by relying on second-hand testimony and ignoring DOJ guidelines.
What a criminal referral means
A referral is not an indictment. It is a formal request from one agency to DOJ to investigate possible crimes, such as:
- making false statements to federal officials
- conspiracy to defraud the United States
- mishandling of classified information
DOJ decides whether to open a case, and prosecutors would need to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt. The whistleblower's identity remains legally protected under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, which complicates any prosecution unless DOJ believes the complaint itself was knowingly false.
Rep. Abe Hamadeh, a Republican, amplified the ODNI release, demanding accountability after declassified documents reveal a whistleblower's bias against Trump, alleging political motives and lack of direct knowledge.
The other side of the story
Democrats and intelligence veterans push back hard:
The complaint was corroborated. The July 25, 2019 call record released by the White House itself showed Trump asking Zelenskyy for "a favor" and mentioning investigations into the Bidens. Multiple first-hand witnesses, including Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Ambassador Gordon Sondland, testified to Congress.
Second-hand is allowed. The ICIG at the time determined the complaint was "credible" and of "urgent concern" under the statute, even though the whistleblower did not hear the call directly. The law does not require first-hand knowledge.
Atkinson followed the law. Atkinson, a Trump appointee, testified he followed the process: he assessed credibility, found indicia of reliability, and forwarded to the acting DNI. The Trump administration initially blocked transmission to Congress, which triggered the legal fight.
Democrats also note that Gabbard herself is under scrutiny for a separate whistleblower complaint. Congress gained access to a classified whistleblower complaint against Tulsi Gabbard, revealing her controversial tenure as DNI and ongoing legal issues, and lawmakers Himes and Warner have demanded answers about delayed transmission of that complaint.
Why this matters now
Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman turned Trump ally, was confirmed as DNI in early 2025. Her tenure has focused on declassifying material from the Russia and Ukraine investigations. The referral fits a broader second-term Trump strategy: use declassification and DOJ referrals to re-litigate the investigations that defined his first term.
Supporters see it as accountability. They argue the 2019 impeachment was built on a complaint that would never have survived normal vetting, and that Atkinson and the whistleblower weaponized intelligence channels for politics.
Critics see retaliation. They argue criminalizing a whistleblower, even one whose complaint was politically inconvenient, will chill future reporting of misconduct, and that Gabbard is using her intelligence powers to settle old scores.
What happens next
- DOJ will review the referral. It can decline, open a preliminary inquiry, or assign a special counsel. No charges have been filed.
- The whistleblower's lawyers are likely to invoke statutory protections and argue the complaint was substantially true, as confirmed by the call record and testimony.
- Congress will hold dueling hearings: Republicans calling for prosecution, Democrats investigating whether Gabbard improperly used classified authorities.
Bottom line
The meme is directionally accurate: DNI Tulsi Gabbard has sent criminal referrals to DOJ targeting the former inspector general and the whistleblower at the center of Trump's 2019 impeachment. The referral alleges the process was politicized and based on second-hand, biased information.
What the meme leaves out is that a referral is not a conviction, the underlying facts of the call were corroborated by first-hand witnesses, and the legal protections for intelligence whistleblowers are intentionally high to prevent exactly this kind of after-the-fact prosecution.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire